AD0-E902 exam certification is an international recognition, which is equivalent to a passport to enter a higher position. The AD0-E902 exam materials and test software provided by our ExamcollectionPass are developed by experienced IT experts, which have been updated again and again. Now you just take dozens of Euro to have such Reliable AD0-E902 Test Materials. Once you get the certification you may have a higher position and salary.
Topic | Details |
---|---|
Topic 1 |
|
Topic 2 |
|
Topic 3 |
|
Topic 4 |
|
>> AD0-E902 New Dumps Files <<
With our AD0-E902 learning questions, you can enjoy a lot of advantages over the other exam providers’. The most attraction aspect is that our high pass rate as 98% to 100%. I believe every candidate wants to buy AD0-E902 exam materials that with a high pass rate, because the data show at least two parts of the AD0-E902 Exam Guide, the quality and the validity. Only with high quality and valid information, our candidates can successfully pass their AD0-E902 exams.
NEW QUESTION # 44
A Fusion Developer receives frequent notifications that a specific Scenario has been stopped. Upon investigation, the developer notes that there is nothing wrong with the data or process in the scenario, but that the error always occurs on a specific module that calls a third-party system. The error recorded is consistently a service unavailable error, particularly during times of high network traffic to the target system.
Which action should the Fusion Developer take to reduce the number of times the scenario is automatically stopped by Fusion?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In this scenario, the error consistently arises due to the unavailability of a third-party service during high traffic times. This is a temporary issue and does not indicate a problem with the data or process. The recommended approach in such cases is to configure the scenario to retry failed executions:
* Update Scenario Settings:
* In Workfront Fusion, you can configure scenarios to automatically retry a failed execution.
* This option ensures that temporary issues, like service unavailability, are retried after a delay, reducing the chances of the scenario being stopped permanently.
* This is particularly useful when dealing with network traffic spikes or third-party API throttling.
* Why Not Other Options?
* B. Update the Module settings to automatically ignore failed executions: Ignoring failed executions would cause incomplete or incorrect data to flow through the scenario, leading to potential downstream issues.
* C. Add an error handler to the Module and select a Break directive: While error handlers are useful, the Break directive stops the scenario from processing further, which is not ideal for a temporary issue.
* D. Add an additional route after the failing module with a repeater: Adding a repeater increases complexity and is unnecessary when the retry option is already available in scenario settings.
References:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Scenario Settings and Error Handling
* Experience League Community: Handling API Rate Limits and Errors in Workfront Fusion
NEW QUESTION # 45
A Fusion user is developing a scenario. The first half of the scenario needs to be tested for consistency. No additional actions are to be executed.
Which control module is required to disable the execution of subsequent modules?
Answer: B
Explanation:
* Understanding the Requirement:
* The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.
* This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.
* Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:
* TheBreakmodule is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.
* It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.
* Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option A ("Router"):
* The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of subsequent modules.
* Option B ("Sleep"):
* The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules permanently.
* Option C ("Ignore"):
* There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.
* Steps to Use the Break Module:
* Insert theBreakmodule at the point where you want to stop execution.
* Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.
* Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.
* How This Solves the Problem:
* The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation
* Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development
NEW QUESTION # 46
A customer wants all their Salesforce Opportunities to sync with their connected projects in Workfront - approximately 20,000+ projects.
After the admin sets a Workfront Fusion scenario to run each night and perform this action, the scenario is run once to test. After 40 minutes, it unexpectedly stops running.
Why did this occur?
Answer: B
Explanation:
* Understanding the Issue:
* The customer is syncing20,000+ Salesforce Opportunitieswith Workfront projects using a scheduled Fusion scenario.
* After running for 40 minutes, the scenario unexpectedly stops.
* Why Option C is Correct:
* Workfront Fusion Execution Timeout:
* Fusion scenarios have a default execution timeout of40 minutesper run.
* If the scenario exceeds this time limit, Fusion automatically stops the execution to avoid resource overuse.
* Handling Large Data Sets:
* Scenarios involving large datasets (like syncing 20,000+ records) may require optimizations, such as breaking the data into smaller chunks using paginated requests or iterators.
* In this case, the scenario stopped because the execution timeout was reached, not due to API limits or webhook restrictions.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option A ("Workfront API call limit"):
* While Workfront does have API rate limits, they are generally generous and not the reason for the scenario stopping. Fusion scenarios are designed to manage API calls efficiently.
* Option B ("Fusion times out if processing over 2000 records in 40 minutes"):
* This is incorrect because Fusion does not have a hard limit on the number of records processed in 40 minutes. The timeout is time-based, not record-based.
* Option D ("Workfront API stops webhooks after 2000 hits in 10 minutes"):
* This does not apply to Fusion scenarios. Webhooks are separate from the API calls initiated by Fusion.
* How to Resolve the Issue:
* Split the Data: Use pagination or batch processing to divide the 20,000+ records into smaller chunks (e.g., 1,000 or 2,000 records per run).
* Adjust Scheduling: Schedule the scenario to run more frequently with smaller batches, ensuring all records are synced over multiple runs.
* Use Iterators: Add an Iterator module to loop through smaller subsets of data, preventing the scenario from exceeding the execution timeout.
* Steps to Optimize the Scenario:
* Add aSearch Moduleto retrieve opportunities in smaller batches (e.g., using limits or pagination parameters).
* Use aRepeater Moduleto process each batch iteratively.
* Save the scenario and schedule it to run nightly or more frequently, depending on the sync requirements.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion: Execution Timeout Limits
* Workfront Community: Managing Large Data Sets in Fusion Scenarios
By optimizing the scenario to handle smaller batches of data, the admin can avoid the execution timeout issue and ensure successful syncing of Salesforce Opportunities with Workfront projects.
NEW QUESTION # 47
In a scenario, there are two aggregators displaying different numbers in the bundle inspector: Aggregator 1 displays a 1, and Aggregator 2 displays a 10. What is a possible reason for this difference?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
* Understanding the Scenario:
* The diagram shows two routes, each leading to an aggregator module (Aggregator 1 and Aggregator 2).
* The bundle inspector indicates different output counts for the two aggregators: Aggregator 1 displays 1, and Aggregator 2 displays 10.
* Option Analysis:
* A. Aggregator 1's route is set to process the 1st bundle only, and Aggregator 2's route is set to process all bundles:
* Incorrect. Aggregators process data from their input modules based on their configuration.
While filters or limits might be applied earlier in the flow, the scenario does not suggest that the aggregator's configuration explicitly limits bundles in this way.
* B. The source module for the aggregators are different:
* Correct. The two aggregators receive input from different modules. For example, Aggregator 1 might aggregate bundles from "Projects," which outputs a single bundle, while Aggregator 2 aggregates bundles from "Issues," which outputs 10 bundles. This explains the differing numbers in the bundle inspector.
* C. Aggregator 2 displays a 10 in the bundle inspector because it is set to repeat 10 times:
* Incorrect. Aggregators do not "repeat" a specific number of times. Instead, they process the input bundles passed to them and output a result based on the aggregation logic.
* D. The scenario's router is set to only allow projects through the route to Aggregator 1 and only allows tasks through the route to Aggregator 2:
* Incorrect. While the router might direct specific bundles (e.g., "Projects" to Aggregator 1 and "Issues" to Aggregator 2), the difference in bundle counts is determined by the source modules, not by the router's configuration alone.
* Why Source Modules Determine Bundle Counts:
* Each aggregator processes data from a source module. If the source module outputs different numbers of bundles, the aggregators will show different bundle counts.
* In this example, "Projects" might output only 1 bundle (e.g., 1 project), while "Issues" outputs 10 bundles (e.g., 10 issues).
* How to Verify:
* Inspect the source modules feeding into each aggregator. Check the number of bundles they produce during the scenario run.
* Confirm that the aggregators are aggregating based on their respective inputs.
References:This explanation aligns with Workfront Fusion's handling of bundles and aggregation logic.
Differences in bundle counts at the aggregator level are typically due to differences in the source module outputs, as shown in the scenario.
NEW QUESTION # 48
A solution requested for a use case requires that the scenario is initiated with project updates.
Which Workfront app module will start the scenario immediately?
Answer: C
Explanation:
* Understanding the Question:
* The scenario must begin as soon as a project update occurs in Adobe Workfront.
* The correct Workfront module should continuously monitor for specific changes (in this case, project updates) and trigger the scenario immediately.
* Why Option A ("Watch Events") is Correct:
* Watch Events Module: This module in Adobe Workfront Fusion is specifically designed to monitor events, such as updates to projects, tasks, or issues, and trigger scenarios as soon as those events occur.
* Real-Time Triggering: The "Watch Events" module listens to the Workfront event stream and ensures the scenario starts immediately upon detecting relevant updates.
* Example Use Case: Monitoring updates to a project's status, such as changes in "Completion" or
"Progress," to trigger notifications or integrations with other systems.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option B ("Watch Record"): This module monitors specific Workfront records (e.g., projects, tasks, issues) for new additions or modifications, but it does not initiate scenarios immediately when updates occur. It works better for periodic checks rather than real-time events.
* Option C ("Watch Field"): This module monitors changes to specific fields within a Workfront object, but it is not designed for broader event monitoring like project updates. It is more suited for field-specific tracking.
* Option D ("Search"): This module performs queries to find specific data in Workfront (e.g., searching for projects based on criteria), but it is not an event-driven module and does not automatically trigger scenarios.
* Steps to Configure the Watch Events Module in Workfront Fusion:
* In the Fusion scenario editor, add theWatch Eventsmodule as the first step in your scenario.
* Configure the module:
* Select Workfront Connection: Choose the authorized Workfront account.
* Event Object: Specify the object type (e.g., Project, Task, Issue) to monitor.
* Event Type: Select the type of event to watch, such as "Update" or "Change."
* Save and activate the scenario.
* How This Solves the Problem:
* Using the Watch Events module ensures the scenario is event-driven and starts automatically when the desired project update occurs. This approach is both efficient and timely, meeting the requirement for immediate initiation.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Watch Events Module
* Workfront Community Forum: Use Cases for Watch Events
NEW QUESTION # 49
......
ExamcollectionPass provides Adobe AD0-E902 desktop-based practice software for you to test your knowledge and abilities. The AD0-E902 desktop-based practice software has an easy-to-use interface. You will become accustomed to and familiar with the free demo for Adobe AD0-E902 Exam Questions. Exam self-evaluation techniques in our AD0-E902 desktop-based software include randomized questions and timed tests. These tools assist you in assessing your ability and identifying areas for improvement to pass the Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional exam.
Latest AD0-E902 Test Guide: https://www.examcollectionpass.com/Adobe/AD0-E902-practice-exam-dumps.html
Quick Links
Resources